Legal Opinion

ODC, Pet v. Cynthia A. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 2020No. 2587 DD3Published

1Opinion of the Court

[J-63-2019] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAYLOR, C.J., BAER, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2587 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 : Petitioner : No. 151 DB 2017 : : Attorney

Registration No. 32119

v. : : (Allegheny County) : CYNTHIA A. BALDWIN, : : ARGUED: September 10, 2019 Respondent : OPINION JUSTICE DONOHUE DECIDED: FEBRUARY 19, 2020 In this matter, we consider the request of the Petitioner, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”), to impose discipline in the form of a public censure on Respondent, Cynthia A. Baldwin (“Respondent”),1 in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LucariniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Pirillo v. PirilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API