Legal Opinion

Buller v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1984No. 47271PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Presiding Judge.

Patricia C. Buller and Roberto Rol-dan, plaintiffs, appeal from an order of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis sustaining defendants’ motion to dismiss their petition on the grounds it failed to state a claim against the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed. Hasemeier v. Smith, 361 S.W.2d 697, 699 [1] (Mo. banc 1962). Hill v. General Motors Corporation, 637 S.W.2d 382, 384[1] (Mo.App.1982). On appeal, in determining whether plaintiffs have stated a cause of action we assume every pleaded fact as true and take every favorable inference which may be reasonably drawn…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Scheibel v. HillisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  3. Martin McNally v. The Pulitzer Publishing Company and Ted GestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Sofka v. ThalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  5. Coonis v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Henry v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Sullivan v. Pulitzer Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  3. James Turntine v. Charles PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. Y.G. v. Jewish Hospital of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Morton v. Hearst Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API