Legal Opinion
Druid Hills Civic Ass'n v. Federal Highway Administration
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 23, 1986No. Civ. C-84-1931-APublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
O’KELLEY, District Judge.
Presently before the court are plaintiffs’ motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, and ex penses; federal defendants’ motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs’ conditional motion for voluntary dismissal as to the subject matter of federal defendants’ motion for summary judgment; and plaintiffs’ motion to allow filing of amendment to and clarification of plaintiffs’ brief in support of plaintiffs’ application for fees, costs, and expenses.
FACTS
Plaintiffs filed their complaint in this case on September 28, 1984. The complaint challenged the May 22, 1984 administrative…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Druid Hills Civic Ass'n v. Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Druid Hills Civic Association, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration, Druid Hills Civic Association, Inc. v. Federal Highway Administration, National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987