Legal Opinion

Continental Supply Co. v. Texas Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1928No. 7224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, C. j.

The parties to this litigation were the Continental Supply Company, the Texas Company, the Oxford Oil Company, the Southern Exploration Company, R, -E. Brooks, and R. E. Brooks, Jr. Eor convenience, the four corporations will be referred to as the Continental, Texas, Oxford, and Southern Companies, respectively. The litigation involves the right of the Continental Company to $19,647.91, the agreed value of one-fourth of the production less the royalty from an oil lease covering 11¾ acres, which we will call the Autrey lease. The suit was by the Continental Company against the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hager v. StakesTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Ramirez v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Tittle v. VanleerTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Landers v. Bank of Commerce of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Stair v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malcolm J. Henley and Mary K. Henley v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API