Legal Opinion

Leahy v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided November 28, 1955No. Civ. A. No. 8776Published

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The sole question presented by this appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of nonsuit is whether the plaintiff, a nonunion employee of defendant, is entitled to rights as a third party beneficiary under two collective bargaining agreements entered into between the union and the defendant employer. Plaintiff does not claim to be a union member and holds only a “work permit” card issued by the union.

The right of a union member to recover as a third party beneficiary under such an agreement has been recognized in California [Sublett v. Henry’s etc. Lunch (1942), 21 Cal.2d 273, 275…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Sublett v. Henry's Turk & Taylor LunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Yazoo & M. v. R. Co. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
  4. Gregg v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. MacKay v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API