Darrick Lowe v. San Joaquin County, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 DARRICK LOWE, No. 2:25-cv-3022-TLN-CKD (PS) 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER AND 15 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Darrick Lowe proceeds without counsel and seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See
28 U.S.C. § 20
636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment is before the court. (ECF No. 61.) The 21 motion is suitable for decision without oral argument under Local…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Turner v. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Family Home & Finance Center, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company v. The Assiniboine And Sioux Tribes Of The Fort Peck ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.