Legal Opinion

Adams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 28, 1988No. 6-88-015-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Michael Kent Adams was convicted of aggravated assault of a police officer. Punishment was set by the jury at fifteen years’ confinement. In this appeal Adams contends that error was committed when the jury was allowed to separate in violation of Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 35.23 (Vernon 1966). We agree, and reverse and remand this cause for a new trial.

Following closing arguments at the guilt/innocence phase of the trial, the jury retired to deliberate. When they had deliberated about an hour and a half, they were allowed to separate, by agreement of counsel, until…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Trevino v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  4. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. McDonald v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Parmer v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  2. Hood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Vera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
  4. Barber v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Hood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API