Legal Opinion

Barber v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 27, 1989No. 6-82-080-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND

BLEIL, Justice.

In 1984, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, we found that the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction. Barber v. State, 668 S.W.2d 424 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1984), vacated, 764 S.W.2d 232 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). The highest court in this state disagreed with our determination that the evidence was insufficient and reversed, remanding the case to us to consider the other points which had been raised on the initial appeal.

As judges on this Court we are sworn to uphold the Constitution of Texas. 1 As well as we could, we exercised…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rivas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
  2. Leroy Alford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  3. Leroy Alford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  4. State v. BarberCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API