Legal Opinion

Myles Salt Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1931No. 6050PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

The sole question is limitation. On May 16, 1921 (May 15th was Sunday), Myles Salt Company filed its income tax return for its fiscal year ending February 28,1921, and paid the tax shown by it, all according to the Revenue Act of 1918 then in force (40 Stat. 1057). On November 23, 1921, the Revenue Act of 1921 was approved, effective as to its income tax provisions as of January 1, 1921 (section 263), and repealing as of January 1, 1921, the corresponding provisions of the Revenue Act of 1918 (section 1400). No change was made affecting the tax of this taxpayer except…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Florsheim Brothers Drygoods Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Lucas v. Pilliod Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. United States v. G. Falk & BrotherSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Stairs v. PeasleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  5. United States v. National Tank & Export Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wilson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  2. Angus McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  3. People v. Universal Film Exchanges, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Central Paper Co. v. SouthwickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  5. United States v. TillinghastCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API