Legal Opinion

Hibbs v. Catovolo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 21, 1944No. 11168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment sustaining appellee’s writ of habeas corpus and discharging him from the custody of appellant. The decisive question is whether appellee was subject to military jurisdiction as a member of the armed forces when he applied for the writ.

After being classified in 1A by his local draft board, appellee was ordered to report for induction on August 19, 1943. He voluntarily complied with this order, passed his physical examination, and was put through the regular induction process. He declined to take the oath prescribed as a part of the induction…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayborn v. HeflebowerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Londell Brown and Warren E. Gilliam, Jr. v. Stanley R. Resor, as Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Sanford v. CallanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. HarrisonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
  4. United States v. BarrazaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. Stevenson v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API