Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH.
KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judge:
Mathew Enterprise has raised a Recess Appointments Clause challenge to the National Labor Relations Board’s order in this case. Based on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2550, 189 L.Ed.2d 538 (2014), we reject Mathew Enterprise’s claim.
The National Labor. Relations Board is an independent federal agency. By statute, the Board consists of five members. See 29 U.S.C. § 153(a). The Board members are principal officers of the United States who…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. CanningSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- New Process Steel, L. P. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gestamp South Carolina, L.L.C. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Natl Bank of Big Spring v. Jacob LewCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Ozark Automotive Distributors, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- National Labor Relations Board v. New Vista Nursing & RehabilitationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- National Labor Relations Board v. Southwest Regional Council of CarpentersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.