Legal Opinion
Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Loomis
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 2007No. 103,584PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOUG GABBARD II, Presiding Judge.
T1 Plaintiff, Chesapeake Operating, Inc. (Chesapeake), appeals the trial court's order denying its objections to an appraisers' report in an action initiated by Chesapeake under Oklahoma's Surface Damages Act, 52 0.8. Supp.2006 § 318.5. After thoroughly reviewing the record and the law, we affirm.
FACTS
{2 Defendant, Darwin D. Loomis (Loom-is), is the surface owner of a 240-acre tract in Woodward County, Oklahoma. In 2005, Chesapeake drilled and began operating an oil and gas well on Loomis' property. Chesapeake and Loomis began negotiations regarding surface…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis Oil Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- YDF, INC. v. Schlumar, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Williams Natural Gas Co. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Ward Petroleum Corp. v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- In re Rules Governing Complaints on Judicial MisconductSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- XANADU EXPLORATION COMPANY v. WELCHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- CHESAPEAKE OPERATING INC. v. KAST TRUST FARMSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO OKLAHOMA UNIFORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS - CIVILSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.