Legal Opinion

Rueb v. Bent (In re Bent)

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided September 28, 2001No. Bankruptcy No. 00-72881; Adversary No. 00-7212PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARRY L. LESSEN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This proceeding is before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration. The Defendant has filed a Response to the Motion for Reconsideration and the Plaintiff has filed a Counter-Response.

“Motions for reconsideration” are not formally designated by either the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure or the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except as provided in Bankruptcy Rule 3008, which allows reconsideration of orders allowing or disallowing claims against the estate. Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as adopted by Federal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allan G. Charles v. Richard M. Daley, State's Attorney, and Eugene F. Diamond, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. C.K.S. Engineers, Inc. v. White Mountain Gypsum Company, M.S. Riddle and Eryl A. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Ellingsworth v. ChryslerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  4. Constance Nelson, and Willola M. Garner v. City Colleges of Chicago, an Illinois Community College DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Wilson v. Upjohn Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rueb v. Bent (In re Bent)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API