Legal Opinion

Hanna v. Huer, Johns, Neel, Rivers & Webb

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 20, 1983No. 54,238PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, J.:

This is an appeal by the defendant, Huer, Johns, Neel, Rivers and Webb, a professional corporation and formerly a partnership, (hereafter Huer, Johns, or the architect) from two judgments entered upon jury verdicts in favor of two construction workmen for personal injuries received on the construction jobsite. The injured workmen, O. D. Pearman and Duone Hanna, filed separate suits which were consolidated for trial in the district court. Huer, Johns appeals from each judgment and the cases remain consolidated on appeal.

The plaintiffs were…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Day v. National US Radiator CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  4. Smith v. City of Detroit SwarthoutMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Westerhold v. CarrollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Durflinger v. ArtilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  3. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Cansler v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Jones v. James Reeves Contractors, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API