Legal Opinion
Opinion No. 80-169 (1980) Ag
Oklahoma Attorney General Reports
Decided December 23, 1980Published
1Opinion of the Court
The office of the Attorney General is in receipt of your opinion request, wherein you ask, in effect, the following question: May the Department of Wildlife Conservation pay the cost of optional dependent coverage for its employees? The Department of Wildlife Conservation is a constitutionally created body. Okla. Const., Article XXVI, Section 1 through Article XXVI, Section 4. Also, there are specific statutes found at 29 O.S. 1-101 [29-1-101], et seq. (1971), which executes the above-cited constitutional amendments relating to the Department of Wildlife Conservation. The Oklahoma Group…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In re State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SutfinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- W. S. Dickey Clay Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Poschman v. DumkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.