Blansett v. Blansett

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

Although respondent appellant was represented by counsel still of record in this divorce proceeding, filed an answer to the bill of particulars and joined in the motion for the appointment of a master, she did not appear either in person or by counsel at the hearing before the master. After moving for the appointment, of the master she took no further step until July 25, 1947, when’ through counsel, other than her counsel of record, she obtained an exception to the decree in divorce nunc pro tunc as of May 9, 1947.

On this appeal, although the only assignment of error is…