Legal Opinion

Haralson v. Wheeler

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 4, 1934No. 7966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUGH, Justice.

The parties will be designated ‘as appellants and appellees. Trial was to the court without a jury. The. case arose as follows: D. I. Haralson and wife, Sarah Haralson, owned and occupied prior to .1917 the 269 acres of land, in Mills county, here in controversy. In 1917 Sarah Haralson died intestate and left surviving her husband and five children, four of whom, or their descendants, are appellants here; Bona Wheeler, née Haralson, appellee herein, being the fifth. At that time they owed community debts, secured by a lien on said lands, of approximately $1,000. Thereafter D.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pitts v. ElslerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Faville v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Clark v. HaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Mead v. RandolphTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. HaralsonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Ball v. Bankers Life Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Wheeler v. HaralsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API