Ketchikan Gateway Borough v. Ketchikan Indian Corp.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The superior court applied the implied federal preemption doctrine to exempt from borough taxes all space in a building that contains a tribally operated clinic that is subject to detailed oversight by the Indian Health Service. The narrow question presented here is whether space in the building that is not committed to use by the clinic should be exempt. We answer in the negative because such space is not necessarily part of a pervasively and comprehensively regulated federal program and the borough's interest in taxing the property is not inconsequential.
I. FACTS…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Warren Trading Post Co. v. Arizona Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Cotton Petroleum Corp. v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ramah Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Bureau of Revenue of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Braun v. BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Fairbanks v. Dená Nená HenashAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- In the Matter of the Protective Proceedings of Vernon H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- State, Department of Revenue v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.