Legal Opinion

Mizrahi v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 1999No. 98-2399PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Ralph Mizrahi, appeals from an adverse final judgment. We affirm for several reasons.

First, the record properly indicates that the insurer was required to carry the burden of proving that Mizrahi’s total disability had ceased. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Fruchter, 288 So.2d 36, 37 (Fla.1973)(hold-ing that where an insurance company has previously acknowledged the existence of a total disability and then has terminated the disability payments, the insurance company has the burden of proof to show that the total disability has ceased). Next, the trial court acted within its discretion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brignac v. BoisdoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shaps v. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Audrey Shaps v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Company, Provident Life and Casualty Insurance Company, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Shaps v. Provident Life & AccidentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Shaps v. Provident Life & AccidentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API