Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Mortham

District Court, N.D. Florida

Decided February 7, 1996No. TCA 94-40025-MMPPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PAUL, Chief Judge:

On January 12, 1996, the Court ordered the parties in this cause to fully brief the status of the burden of proof in the strict scrutiny context (Doc. 117). The. following parties filed briefs on the issue: Plaintiffs (Doc. 122); Defendant-Intervenors Cummings and Brown (Doc. 123); Defendanb-Intervenor United States (Doc. 125); Defendant Mortham (Doc. 126); and Defendant-Intervenor NAACP (Doc. 128). Not surprisingly, Plaintiffs argue that since they have proven that Florida’s Third Congressional District was drawn primarily for race-conscious reasons, Defendants and…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996
  2. Mizrahi v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996
  4. Johnson v. MorthamDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API