Legal Opinion

Paul G. Amann v. Office of the Utah Attorney General

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 31, 2026No. 2:18-cv-00341Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH PAUL G. AMANN, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A Plaintiff, NEW TRIAL UNDER RULE 59 v. Case No. 2:18-cv-00341-JNP OFFICE OF THE UTAH ATTORNEY Chief District Judge Jill N. Parrish GENERAL, Defendant. At trial, a jury found in favor of Defendant the Office of the Utah Attorney General (the “AG’s Office” or “Office”) on Plaintiff Paul Amann’s (“Amann”) claims for breach of contract and violation of the Utah Whistleblower Act (“Whistleblower Act”),

Utah Code Ann. §§ 67-21-1

to -10. ECF No. 520 (“Jury…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Bland v. SirmonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  5. Nelson v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API