Legal Opinion

Barr v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided October 19, 1978No. C-2-77-870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the motion of the plaintiff, Michele K. Barr, for declaration of a class action and the motion of the defendant, General Motors Corporation, to strike the reply memorandum of the plaintiff to the memorandum contra the motion to certify the class.

The plaintiff purchased an automobile from the defendant Quality Chevrolet, Inc., on August 30, 1977. Shortly thereafter she discovered discoloration and chipping of the paint on the car. The plaintiff then brought suit in this court as the representative of a class…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richard JOHNSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Samuel WRIGHT, Appellant, v. STONE CONTAINER CORP., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  3. Haywood Cash and Rennell Cash v. Swifton Land CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  4. Nguyen Da Yen v. KissingerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
  5. Wright v. Stone Container CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Feinstein v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  2. Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
  3. Walsh v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  4. Gorman v. Saf-T-Mate, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1981
  5. Lieb v. American Motors Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API