Legal Opinion
Tomey v. Dizinno (In re Dizinno)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 31, 2015No. Case No. 1:14-bk-05291-MDF; Adv. No: 1:15-ap-00012-MDFPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Mary D. France, Chief Bankruptcy Judge
On June 24, 2015 Mark Steven Tomey (“Tomey”), an unrepresented, unsecured creditor, filed an Amended Complaint in the above-captioned adversary ease after his original complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The Amended Complaint, based on the failure of Paul Dizinno (“Debtor”) to repay a series of loans from Tomey totaling $4400, requests the Court either to deny Debtor’s discharge-under 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(3), (4), or (5) or to except the debt from discharge under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2).
On June 30, 2015, Debtor moved to dismiss the Amended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Kingman Park Civic v. Williams, Anthony A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Henry Gibbs, Jr. v. Ms. Marcia Roman, Sci Somerset Librarian, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.