Navassa Guano Co. v. Cockfield
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
In Equity. Suit by the Navassa Guano Company against Ellen Nixon Cockfield and George Dickson, as executors of the will of S. R. Cockfield, deceased, Reamer L. Cockfield, and the Volunteer State Life Insurance Company.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
The bill of complaint in this case was filed on the 30th of March, 1917. All parties defendant have been duly served with process and have appeared and answered. The cause, being at issue, came on to be heard. The testimony has been taken, and counsel for all parties interested have been heard. The facts of the cáse appear to he that one S. R. Cockfield on the 5th February, 1916, took out a policy of insurance in the Volunteer State Life Insurance Company for $6,000, for which he was to pay the annual premium of $185.70. The policy was payable unto the executors,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hursey v. LaneCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1916
- Harriman National Bank v. HuietDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1916
3Cited by10 opinions
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Royal Union Mut. Life Ins. v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- Lofaro v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- Fletcher v. WypiskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 1950
- Hall v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.