Legal Opinion
McClellan v. F. A. North Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided October 2, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jayne, C. C. J.
The controversial issues of law and fact in this action have been submitted by stipulation of counsel to the court for determination without a jury. It transpires, however, that the basic facts essential to the consideration of the case are not in a state of dispute or uncertainty.
The initial transaction between these parties, which apparently occurred on November 1st, 1927, is evidenced by an agreement in writing. This agreement, if accepted literally, reveals that the F. A. North Company “leases and hires” a certain piano to James McClellan and Sarah McClellan for the term of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Coral Gables, Inc. v. KretschmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Waln v. WalnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Jaqui v. BenjaminSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- Rapoport v. Rapoport Express Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1919
- Summerside Bank v. RamseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marshall v. Geo. M. Brewster & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Retail Store Employees Union, Local 1001 v. Washington Surveying & Rating BureauWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Miller v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. JacobsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
- Kentucky Dept. of Mental Health v. MullinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.