James V. Mazuca & Associates v. Schumann
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLEE’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION EN BANC
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
After reviewing the panel opinion and judgment en banc, the court withdraws the panel opinion and judgment issued'May 16, 2001, issuing this opinion and judgment in their place.
This is a legal malpractice case. James Mazuca (“Mazuca”), a San Antonio attorney, was sued by his client, Walter Schumann (“Schumann”). . The jury found that Mazuca was guilty of both professional negligence and violations of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”). The jury awarded Schumann $80,000 in damages…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
- Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. v. National Development & Research Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Floyd v. HefnerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
- Seasha Pools, Inc.// Robert Hardister v. Robert Hardister// Cross-Appellee, Seasha Pools, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
- Valentine v. WattersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Giron v. KoktavyColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.