Legal Opinion

Roberto Escobio v. American International Group

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 23, 2001No. 00-15541PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBINA, Circuit Judge:

This case involves an appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant American International Group, Inc. (“AIG”) on the Plaintiffs’ claim that a brokerage contract is not illegal under Chilean law. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs Roberto Escobio, Claudio Salazar and Christopher Sweeney (“Plaintiffs”) were employed individually by Smith Barney, Inc. (“Smith Barney”) as “registered representatives” in Miami, Florida. During their employment, they formed a partnership to develop insurance business in Chile and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ginger Rogers v. Alberto Grimaldi, Mgm/ua Entertainment Co., and Pea Produzioni Europee Associate, S.R.L.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. McConnell v. Commonwealth Pictures Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
  3. Benjamin v. KoeppelNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Dornberger v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  5. Lloyd Capital Corp. v. Pat Henchar, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belize Telecom, Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. George Cornea v. United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API