Legal Opinion
Shiny Rock Mining Corp. v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 10, 1986No. Civ. 84-643PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
REDDEN, District Judge:
Magistrate Dale filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 24, 1985. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the record de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir.1983). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.1983). I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Findings and Recommendation that defendants’ motion for summary judgment # 27 should be granted and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Union Oil Co. of Cal. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- W. G. Nickol and Eva Rose Nickol, His Wife v. United States of America and Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Lorin Corporation v. Goto & Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shiny Rock Mining Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1991