Milestone Operating, Inc. v. ExxonMobil Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION ON REHEARING
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
We issued our original opinion in this case on March 15, 2011. Thereafter, ap-pellee ExxonMobil Corporation (“Exxon-Mobil”) filed a motion for rehearing. Appellants Milestone Operating, Inc. and DSTJ, L.L.P. (collectively “appellants”) filed a response. We grant ExxonMobil’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our previous opinion, vacate our previous judgment, and issue this substitute opinion and a new judgment.
The trial court granted default judgment in favor of ExxonMobil and against appellants. In four issues, appellants contend they…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- In the Interest of R.R. & S.J.S.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Walker v. GutierrezTexas Supreme Court · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Milestone Operating, Inc. and Dstj, L.L.P. v. Exxonmobil CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Milestone Operating, Inc., and DSTJ, L.L.P. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- RO-BT Investments, LLP v. Le Properties, LLC and Le Commercial, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014