Legal Opinion

Milestone Operating, Inc. and Dstj, L.L.P. v. Exxonmobil Corporation

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2012No. 11-0647PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we consider whether the defendants satisfied the first element of the Craddock test for setting’ aside a no-answer default judgment. See Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc., 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124, 126 (1939) (requiring a new trial if the defendant shows (1) that the default was neither intentional nor the result of conscious indifference, (2) a meritorious defense, and (3) that a new trial would cause neither delay nor undue prejudice). Because the evidence in this case established that the defendants’ failure to answer was not intentional or the result of conscious…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Director, State Employees Workers' Compensation Division v. EvansTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Sutherland v. SpencerTexas Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. in Re Valliance Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  2. Lynch v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  3. Edith Roman v. Jose Luis Rios Ramirez, Sr., Velia Rios Ramirez and Jose Luis Rios Ramirez, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019
  4. Sedona Pacific Housing Partnership D/B/A Sedona Pacific Properties and Gonzalez Financial Holdings, Inc. v. Alfonso Ventura and Maria Ventura, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2013
  5. Dalmex, Ltd. v. Apparel Enterprises, Inc. and Salvador Del Rio, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API