Legal Opinion
Poughkeepsie Supermarket Corp. v. County of Dutchess
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 15, 2015No. 14-CV-1702 (CS)Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
SEIBEL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). (Doc. 16:) For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED.
I. Background
A. Facts
For purposes of this Motion, the Court accepts as true the facts (but not the conclusions) alleged by Plaintiff in the SAC.
Plaintiff Poughkeepsie Supermarket Corp. (d/b/a Market Fresh) has operated a retail food establishment (“the store”) in the City of Poughkeepsie since 2011. (SAC ¶ 5.) In 1991, Defendant County of Dutchess enacted Local Law No. 9, which was thereafter amended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.