Carter v. State

— Clarence Carter was convicted of robbery. The crime involved the holdup of a gasoline filling station attendant. Upon appeal Carter asserts the following errors:(1) Misconduct by the trial court immediately preceding voir dire examination in that the court introduced the police officer who had signed the four charging affidavits 1 as “one of Anderson’s finest policemen”.(2) Erroneous exclusion of evidence concerning an intimate personal relationship between two witnesses for the State.(3) Error in giving an instruction with respect to aiding and abetting commission of a crime, in light of…