Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cox v. Vaught

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1931No. 553PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

The petitioners have asked leave to file a petition in mandamus against the Honorable Edgar S. Vaught, Judge of the United States District Court, for the Western District of Oklahoma. The application, together with the attached petition for mandamus, discloses the following facts:

The petitioners, with others, have been indicted for using the mails in pursuance of a scheme to defraud. To that indictment the petitioners have filed a motion to quash, which is positively verified by eáeh defendant in person. The motion to quash alleges: “That the said indictment, nor any…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. McKinney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  4. Kastel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  5. Brady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  3. Tinkoff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
  4. United States v. Adrian J. Short, Jr. Earl L. RiedelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. United States v. Joseph D. Nunan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API