Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State of Indiana v. Brishen R. Vanderkolk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 2014No. 79A04-1308-CR-407Published

1ConcurrenceBailey, Judge

The lead opinion holds as unconstitutional the fruits of the search of Vanderkolk’s room on the theory that the Community Corrections Officers’ search of the house was unreasonable. While I concur in the result, I reach my conclusion on a different basis.

Under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as interpreted by our courts, warrantless searches and seizures inside a home are per se unreasonable except in certain circumstances. Krise v. State, 746 N.E.2d 957, 961 (Ind.2001) (citing Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 586, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980)). Where a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API