Legal Opinion

State v. Salway

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1992No. 17510PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WUEST, Justice.

Carmen Louise Salway (Salway) pled guilty to one count of forgery, SDCL 22-39-36, and to being an habitual offender, SDCL 22-7-7.

At the sentencing hearing the trial court said, in part,

It will be the judgment and sentence of the court that you be and you are hereby sentenced to serve seven years ...

[[Image here]]

Your sentence of- seven years consists of five years on the forgery and two years on the habitual offender.

The written judgment and sentence simply reflects a seven year penitentiary term after Salway’s conviction of forgery and being an habitual offender.

On appeal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CadySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ex Parte WattSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State v. UpchurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. DemarscheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. MunkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. KarpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. FlowersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Rowley v. South Dakota Board of Pardons & ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. SalwaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API