Legal Opinion

Pineiro v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 12, 1945No. 24195-GPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

This cause has been submitted to the court for decision on the merits after trial. Previously the court determined respondent’s exceptions to the libel (D.C., 62 F. Supp. 95) but there expressly refrained from passing upon respondent’s contention that the Suits in Admiralty Act, 41 Stat. 525, 46 U.S.C.A. § 741 et seq., does not impose liability in personam upon the United States based upon the unseaworthiness of a vessel time chartered to the United States, reserving decision on that question for the trial.

After a study of the “historical background and considerations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  2. Burkholder v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Hiltz v. Atlantic Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  4. Pineiro v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1945

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Balfour, Guthrie & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1950
  2. Western Tankers Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
  3. Sutton v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1947
  4. Selby v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API