Legal Opinion

Highstone v. Burdette

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Mackinac. (Steere, J.) Ejectment.' Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion and reporter’s note.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This case was before this Court, and was disposed of at the June term, 1884, and is reported in Highstone v. Burdette, 54 Mich. 329, to which reference is made for the main facts in the case. (See note, page 60.)

The only additional facts appearing in the record now before us consist of testimony which tended to show that plaintiff’s grantors were aware of the fact that Louis Martin was in possession of the whole premises, and claiming to own the whole thereof, as early as 1863 or 1864. The testimony was given by Louis Claremont, who testified that he visited Martin in 1870, while he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
  2. Inhabitants of Reading v. Inhabitants of WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  3. Highstone v. BurdetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bosley v. PrueterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hawes v. WeedenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. In re West Michigan Distributing Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1967
  4. Ivinson v. HuttonWyoming Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API