Legal Opinion

Fry v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1975No. 2-1174A269PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoffman, J.

Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Paulette Fry was found guilty of the offense of uttering a forged instrument as defined in IC 1971, 35-1-124-1, Ind.Ann. Stat. § 10-2102 (Burns 1956). The trial court then ordered that appellant be committed to the custody of the Superintendent of the Indiana Women’s Prison for a period of not less than two nor more than fourteen years; that she be *3fined in the sum of $10; and that she satisfy costs. Appellant timely filed her motion to correct errors which was overruled, and the present appeal was perfected.

The first issue to be considered is…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  2. Ballard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Sumpter v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Roddy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Alexander v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Anton v. Anton Interiors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Boney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API