Legal Opinion
People v. Pujals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 19, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Asch, J.
This is an application by appellate counsel to be permitted *103to withdraw. Since this particular motion raises questions which are likely to recur, we feel it appropriate to explain the obligations of counsel on such an application.
The assigned counsel states that he has complied with People v Saunders (52 AD2d 833) by making a thorough examination of the record, and concludes that the appeal does not present any nonfrivolous issues. In a 21-page brief, counsel gives a summary of the hearing and trial testimony, without any reference to objections raised by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. SaundersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- People v. CasianoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. VasquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. FlytheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Harlem-Dowling Children's Services v. Laverne F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. NashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. PujalsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. DuncanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993