Legal Opinion

Mankey v. Hoyt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from 'Circuit Court, Clark County. Hon. George H. Marquis, Judge. Action by William Mankey, administrator of Mary Mankey against H. L. Hoyt. From the judgment, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

This action was instituted to secure the cancellation of a recorded contract to convey certain real property owned by the plaintiff. The relief sought was granted upon condition that the plaintiff pay to or deposit for' the defendant $500, with interest, and certain costs. Being dissatisfied with the conditions, the plaintiff applied for a new trial, which was refused, and she appealed. Subsequently the administrator of her estate was substituted as party plaintiff.

The facte as found by the learned trial judge are substantially as follows: On September 19, 1902, at a farm near Garden City, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seybold v. Grand Forks National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Manitoba Mortg. & Inv. Co. v. WeissSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Silfvast v. AsplundMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Carnicle v. SwannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Carnicle v. SwannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Lovely v. WangsnessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API