Legal Opinion

Durkee v. People ex rel. Askren

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 22, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memorandum.—Quo warranto proceedings. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Peoria County; the Hon. Thomas M. Shaw, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the December term, 1893, and affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cartwright

An information in the nature of a quo warranto was filed in pursuance of leave granted for that purpose, upon the relation of M. F. Askren, against Edward H. Durkee, the appellant, to contest the right of appellant to hold the office of director of the Toledo, Peoria and Western Railway Company. A demurrer was interposed to the information and the demurrer being overruled, appellant elected to abide by it, and judgment of ouster and for costs was entered against him.

The facts appearing in the information, which it is necessary for us to state, are as follows: The Toledo, Peoria and Western…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Monument National Bank v. Globe WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Penn v. BornmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe Co. v. Lafayette, Muncie, & Bloomington RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Brightman v. HicksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kyser v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908
  2. Dow v. HigginsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API