Ford v. New York Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.
This ease poses tbe question: Was there sufficient evidence to be submitted to tbe jury upon tbe issue as to whether tbe plaintiff became totally and permanently disabled within tbe meaning -of tbe disability clause in tbe policies in suit before tbe anniversaries of tbe policies nearest tbe plaintiff’s sixtieth birthday, namely, 28 October, 1939 — that is, prior to 2 December, 1939, 14 December, 1939, and 12 January, 1940, respectively? We are constrained to answer in tbe negative.
Tbe plaintiff’s evidence, including bis own testimony, was to tbe effect that be bad practiced law continuously…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Thigpen v. Jefferson Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Medlin v. Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gregory v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Lineberry v. Security Life & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Scarboro v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- North Carolina National Bank v. United States Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963
- Ray v. Hospital Care Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.