Legal Opinion

Timock v. Bolz

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1996No. 69672PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’Donnell, Presiding Judge.

This is the second time this case has been appealed. Initially, this court remanded the matter for resolution of pending counterclaims. The trial court then dismissed all remaining claims with a nunc pro tunc judgment entry, thereby preserving for appellate review two summary judgment rulings.

The administrator of the estate of Richard Bolz now appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Heritage Mutual and Cincinnati Insurance Companies for breach of contract in denying coverage and in failing to provide a defense against a wrongful…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Farm Automobile Insurance v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weddborn v. DoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Zakutansky v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API