Legal Opinion · Dissent

Oates v. Oates

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1945No. 9622Published

1DissentKenna, Judge

It is to be borne in mind that the decree below was for the complainant and that if, upon any reasonable theory, the allegations of the bill of complaint and the proof combined consistently make out a case for equitable relief, the decree is to be sustained as being in response to the bill’s prayer for general relief. Grant v. Swank, 74 W. Va. 93, 81 S. E. 967, L. R. A. 1915B, 881, Ann. Cas. 1917C, 286; Davis v. Lilly, 96 W. Va. 144, 122 S. E. 444.

Without going into the detail of an overloaded transcript that the Court’s opinion covers fully, it can be said that the marriage was entirely a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Daniels v. TearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Bemis Bro. Bag Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Harper v. Building Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Davis v. LillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Taylor v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API