Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Ansley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided June 10, 1907No. 16,651PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Action by C. D. Stuart against M. E. Ansley. Application by O. D. Stuart for writ of mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.
A rule nisi was applied for by applicant, granted, and addressed to the honorable the judge of the civil district court, division E.
The plaintiff in the original suit obtained a writ of sequestration and injunction. A bond for each writ was signed by a foreign surety company.
Plaintiff averred that a rule had been taken by defendant in the injunction and sequestration proceedings to dissolve and set aside the writs of sequestration and injunction or to compel him to give new bonds.
The ground of relator’s application is that the surety company which furnished these new bonds was no longer doing…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Reynolds v. EganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Ansley v. StuartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Auto Body Corp. v. BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
- Auto Body Corp. v. Sancho BonetSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1937
- Clemens v. TestardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1909