Legal Opinion

United States v. E. Gordon Dickie, M.D.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 30, 1985No. 84-1100PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant appeals from an order of the district court pursuant to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure correcting the literal terms of the district court’s prior Judgment and Commitment Order. The defendant, Dr. Gordon Dickie, contends that the district court erred in granting the government’s motion to correct the language contained in the defendant’s Judgment and Commitment Order to reflect that the fines imposed on the defendant’s Medicaid fraud, 42 U.S.C. § 1396h, and mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341, convictions are cumulative. We affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The defendant was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Reginald JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. John Edward StevensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Robert Kaye, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Walter A. NiemiecCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Richard Ralph Bergmann, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. Todd PennaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. United States v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. WallaceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. HovsepianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API