Legal Opinion
United States v. John Edward Stevens
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 18, 1977No. 76-2564PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal challenges the trial court’s correction of an error in the sentencing of defendant Stevens. We affirm on the ground that a timely correction of an illegally imposed sentence was accomplished. (Fed.R.Crim.P. 35.)
Stevens was charged with three bank robberies in districts outside the Central District of California, and these cases were transferred to that district pursuant to Rule 20 (Fed.R.Crim.P. 20) for plea and sentencing. The plea bargain struck was an agreement that, among other things, a set of concurrent 10-year sentences would be the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Robert Eugene Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Juan Munoz-Dela RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Ernest S. Borum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Robert Breest v. Raymond Helgemoe, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Darnell GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Walter T. BestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Randy GREENAWALT, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Terry L. STEWART, Et Al., Respondents-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WarrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.