Clover Cutting Die Co. v. Sam Smith Shoe Corp.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlandin, J.
The plaintiff claims first, there was no evidence of an implied warranty of fitness, second, if such warranty existed that the defendant did not sustain its burden of proving a breach and lastly that the amount of the verdict is unwarranted. We believe these contentions cannot be sustained and that the verdict must be upheld. The record shows there was only one purpose for which these dies were to be used, that such purpose was obvious and known to the trade and the parties. The defendant in ordering the dies specified only their size and shape. The method of manufacture, the material and the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Dailey v. Holiday Distributing CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Guy v. HanleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Kalman v. HutchesonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
- Paquette v. St. ClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Wilson v. LeGriceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.