Legal Opinion

Clark County Council v. Donahue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 2007No. 10S00-0606-CV-199PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

A dispute has arisen in Clark County over the purposes for which “probation users’ fees” collected from persons placed on probation can be spent and the authority for making those spending decisions. State law is clear that probation users’ fees may be spent only to supplement probation services and to supplement salaries for probation officers; they may not be used to replace other funding of probation services. The county fiscal body shares authority for spending decisions with the courts in the county that provides probation services.

Background

As we have previously…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Reyes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Stephens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Gordy v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. St. Joseph County Commissioners v. NemethIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Gilda Orange, Members of the Common Council of the City of East Chicago, Ind. v. Hon. Sonya A. MorrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. In the Matter of Mandate of Funds St. Joseph County Commissioners and St. Joseph County Council v. The Hon. Peter J. Nemeth and the St. Joseph Probate CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API