Font v. Carr
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHEN, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment that asserted the defense of official immunity. Tex.R.App.P. 42(a); Tex.Civ.PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(5) (Vernon Supp.1993). When successfully invoked, an officer is immune from suit, not just from liability. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 526, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 2815, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). The principal questions are 1) whether an assistant district attorney has absolute or qualified immunity when advising county officials about bail bondsmen, and 2) if the immunity is qualified, is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Vera v. TueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Scott v. Britton, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2000
- Clawson v. Wharton County, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Aldine Independent School District v. Ogg, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- City of Columbus v. Barnstone, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.